eggy/eifueo
1
1
Fork 1
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

chem: fix equation latex

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
eggy 2020-09-29 13:48:58 -04:00
parent 23c9b28a30
commit 0011cada7b
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/sch3uz.md
View File

@ -160,10 +160,10 @@ The atomic radius of an atom is the distance from the centre of the nucleus to a
### Ionisation energy ### Ionisation energy
The first ionisation energy of an element is the minimum amount of energy required to remove one mole of electrons from one mole of *gaseous* atoms to form a mole of gaseous ions, so that The first ionisation energy of an element is the minimum amount of energy required to remove one mole of electrons from one mole of *gaseous* atoms to form a mole of gaseous ions, so that
$$Q_{(g)} \rightarrow Q_{(g)}^+ + e^-$$ $$\text{Q}_\text{(g)} \rightarrow \text{Q}_\text{(g)}^+ + \text{e}^-$$
Any subsequent ionisation energies of an element are the minimum amount of energy required to remove one *additional* mole of electrons. For example, the second ionisation energy would involve Any subsequent ionisation energies of an element are the minimum amount of energy required to remove one *additional* mole of electrons. For example, the second ionisation energy would involve
$$Q_{(g)}^- \rightarrow Q_{(g)}^{2+} + e^-$$ $$\text{Q}_\text{(g)}^- \rightarrow \text{Q}_\text{(g)}^{2+} + \text{e}^-$$
It requires vastly more energy to remove an electron from a filled valence shell compared to an unfilled valence shell. It requires vastly more energy to remove an electron from a filled valence shell compared to an unfilled valence shell.