From 0ee1421aaaf860e2a0168cd1341a9f0b29df0e9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Su Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 03:05:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update OPCVL.md --- Grade 10/History/CHC2DZ/OPCVL.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Grade 10/History/CHC2DZ/OPCVL.md b/Grade 10/History/CHC2DZ/OPCVL.md index 4d8569e..8ea2876 100644 --- a/Grade 10/History/CHC2DZ/OPCVL.md +++ b/Grade 10/History/CHC2DZ/OPCVL.md @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Questions to ask: - You are essentially giving other historians warnings or advice about some othe the potential problems with using this source in the study of history. - **The content**: If the content of the source is too general or too focused on unimportant details, this might prove to be a problem. The source can also be missing import details as well - **The time and place**: the time and place of the source that was created provides context and `presentisim` can play a role here. -- **Bias*8: Bias of the source, (the 4 types of biases) +- **Bias**: Bias of the source, (the 4 types of biases) - **The Style**: If the style is hard to read or the diction and language used is biased or useless - **The Background**: If the source does not cite, fact check or is a "just for fun" website. - **Technical values** are the limitation that consider the format, readbility etc.